Nikon Z50 vs Sony A6400: Which Is Better?

Nikon Z50 vs Sony Alpha a6400

In addition, the Z50 offers eye-based autofocus, however it isn’t as sophisticated as that found on the Sony cameras. During my little time at the press event, I saw that the Nikon recognized eyeballs really well, but we have yet to know how accurate the performances are. A total of 425 phase and contrast detection points are included in the A6100 and A6400, which is more than twice as many as are present in the Nikon.

Nikon Z50

When it comes to the Alpha A6400, there is no comparison.

Sony Alpha a6400 Nikon Z50

Keep in note that the weight of an ILC will vary according on the lens that you are using at the time of measurement. The following is a front-on size comparison of the Z50 and the A6400, taken from the top down. Another key consideration is whether or not picture stabilization is available. Because none of these bodies are equipped with sensor-based image stabilization, you will need to purchase lenses that provide optical stabilization. Currently, there are 8 lenses with image stabilization for the Nikon Z mount and 35 lenses with image stabilization for the Sony E mount. All of these features, including high resolution, weatherproof bodies, and a large dynamic range, are essential.

The snapshot below may help you get a better feel of the differences in the sensor sizes in the Z50 and A6400. Let’s take a closer look at the Nikon Z50 against the Sony A6400, with the former being an Entry-Level Mirrorless and the latter being an Advanced Mirrorless from rivals Nikon and Sony, respectively. The Z50 and the A6400 have sensor resolutions that are quite similar, and they also have sensor sizes that are identical to one another (APS-C). Using a hybrid focusing technology with both contrast and phase detection points, all three mirrorless cameras are similar in design.

What is the difference between the Canon M6 Mark II and the Nikon Z50 Nikon Z50 vs Sony Alpha a6400 and the Sony A6400?

The imaging sensor is at the heart of digital cameras, and its size is one of the most important aspects in determining the quality of the images captured. Furthermore, when employing narrow depth-of-field to separate a subject from its backdrop, a big sensor camera will provide the photographer with extra creative alternatives. Larger sensors, on the other hand, are more costly and result in larger and heavier cameras and lenses, which are less portable. The qualities that distinguish cameras, apart from their physical appearance and sensor, may and do vary. With regard to the electronic viewfinder, the two cameras under examination are identical in that they each include one. While the A6400 has a greater resolution, the one in the Z50 has a little higher resolution than the one in the A6400.


However, some cameras simply have an electronic shutter, and others have both an electronic and a mechanical shutter in addition to one another. In reality, both of the cameras under discussion are equipped with an electronic shutter, which allows them to shoot absolutely silently when necessary. While this mode is good for capturing still items, it is less ideal for photographing moving objects or shooting under artificial lighting. The review ratings shown above, on the other hand, should be viewed with caution.

دیدگاه‌ خود را بنویسید

نشانی ایمیل شما منتشر نخواهد شد. بخش‌های موردنیاز علامت‌گذاری شده‌اند *